This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0032885509339506v1 0032885509339506v2 89/3/286    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dell, C. A. Articles by Kilty, J. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Looking Back 10 Years After the Arbour Inquiry

Ideology, Policy, Practice, and the Federal Female Prisoner

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, cikkeeb{at}usask.ca

Catherine J. Fillmore

University of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Jennifer M. Kilty

University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

The decade of the 1990s can be marked as one of major dissension, conflict, and change within federal corrections for women in Canada. In this article, the authors reflect back on this period of time by examining the correctional ideologies, policies, and practices that were operating in the Canadian federal prison for women. Finding these policies and practices to be inherently gendered and punitive in nature, it is argued that punishment was at the time and continues to be the cornerstone of the regulation of women prisoners, and that it takes a specific, gendered form that relies on the deployment of traditional patriarchal conceptions of femininity. Drawing on interviews with correctional personnel and analyses of correctional policies and the Arbour Inquiry transcripts, this article reconstructs Correctional Service of Canada’s (CSC) responses to incarcerated women’s "unfeminine" behavior, specifically women’s self-harming behavior and their violence against others, as overly disciplinary. It is proposed that CSC’s ideological foundation, as well as the practices and policies that were operating both at the time of and following the incident at the Kingston Prison for Women that resulted in the Arbour Inquiry, remain deeply entrenched in an oppressive hierarchical structure of gender inequality. This structure fails to question how traditional conceptions of femininity shape policies and practices. It has also aided in the construction of a new genre of "misbehaved" women in corrections, which in turn has been used to justify the harsh regulatory treatment of federally sentenced women. Without challenging its traditional gender ideologies, CSC is unable to offer any alternatives to its punitive practices, which continue to operate.

Key Words: women • prison • regulation • violence

This version was published on September 1, 2009

The Prison Journal, Vol. 89, No. 3, 286-308 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0032885509339506


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?