This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by King, K. Articles by Ritchie Breach, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Violence in the Supermax

A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky

Benjamin Steiner

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

Stephanie Ritchie Breach

Third District Youth Court, Caldwell, Idaho

The supermax prison was designed to control the most violent, assaultive individuals, gang members, and other prisoners who could not be managed in less secure settings. Pelican Bay State Prison, which houses California's supermax, holds approximately 1,300 inmates in its security housing unit (SHU). This article examines the mission, architecture, and organization of Pelican Bay State Prison, the architecture and procedures in the SHU, the training and mind-set of correctional officers who work at Pelican Bay, the inmate culture and mentality, and the findings of the federal court in Madrid v. Gomez, which addressed conditions in the SHU. The authors maintain that the mission of Pelican Bay, combined with the officer and inmate cultures, creates a self fulfilling prophecy: the super violent supermax.

Key Words: supermax • inmate culture • correctional officer culture • Madrid v. Gomez

The Prison Journal, Vol. 88, No. 1, 144-168 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0032885507311000


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?