| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded OffenderUniversity of North Texas In Atkins v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the execution of mentally retarded offenders is constitutionally prohibited by the Eighth Amendmenta holding directly opposite to the conclusion it reached on this issue 13 years previously in Penry v. Lynaugh. This article examines the specific holdings in these two landmark decisions dealing with mentally retarded capital offenders as well as the roles they play in the evolution of the Supreme Courts capital punishment jurisprudence.
Key Words: mentally retarded national consensus proportionality punishment purpose Penry Atkins
The Prison Journal, Vol. 84, No. 3,
340-360 (2004) |
|||