Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Prison Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prendergast, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reducing Substance Use in Prison: The California Department of Corrections Drug Reduction Strategy Project

Michael L. Prendergast

University of California, Los Angeles

Michael Campos

University of California, Los Angeles

David Farabee

University of California, Los Angeles

William K. Evans

California Department of Corrections

Julian Martinez

California Department of Corrections

Inmate welfare, staff security, public health concerns, and the need for recovery-friendly prison environments have been cited as supporting efforts to control in prison substance use. This article reports on the California Department of Corrections (CDC) Drug Reduction Strategy Project, which involved systematic random urine testing and drug interdiction measures. The two-phase evaluation took place at four CDC institutions, with three serving as test sites and one serving as a standard-procedures comparison site. The results of Phase I, random urine testing of 150 inmates per week from the eligible inmate general population, supported the effectiveness of systematic random urine testing in reducing in-prison substance use, as measured by the number of inmates refusing to test or testing positive for illicit substances. The results of Phase II, which involved continued random urine testing at the three test sites in addition to K-9 drug detection teams at one institution and drug detection equipment at another institution, led to further reductions in substance use, but few drug finds resulted from the additional interdiction measures.

Key Words: prison substance use • drug interdiction • drug testing

The Prison Journal, Vol. 84, No. 2, 265-280 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0032885504265485
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?