Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Prison Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HANLON, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by O'GRADY, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Relative Effects of Three Approaches to the Parole Supervision of Narcotic Addicts and Cocaine Abusers

THOMAS E. HANLON

University of Maryland at Baltimore

DAVID N. NURCO

University of Maryland at Baltimore

RICHARD W. BATEMAN

Friends Research Institute, Inc.

KEVIN E. O'GRADY

University of Maryland

This study examined the 1-year parole outcomes of 504 newly released parolees with a history of heroin and/or cocaine abuse who were randomly assigned, within gender, race, and primary drug of choice, to one of the following three interventions: a program of "social support," combining weekly urine monitoring with counseling, case management, and case advocacy; weekly urine monitoring alone; and routine parole. Results indicated a superiority of social support treatment over the other two comparison conditions, particularly urine monitoring alone. Supplemental analyses indicated a general superiority of substance abuse treatment over no treatment, whether or not treatment was delivered within the social support framework.

The Prison Journal, Vol. 79, No. 2, 163-181 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0032885599079002003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
D. Longshore, S. Turner, and T. Fain
Effects of Case Management on Parolee Misconduct: The Bay Area Services Network
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 205 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
J. F. Quinn and L. A. Gould
The Prioritization of Treatment among Texas Parole Officers
The Prison Journal, September 1, 2003; 83(3): 323 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
M. K. Stohr, C. Hemmens, B. Shapiro, B. Chambers, and L. Kelley
Comparing Inmate Perceptions of Two Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, December 1, 2002; 46(6): 699 - 714.
[Abstract] [PDF]