The Prison Journal

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MATTHEWS, R.
Right arrow Articles by PITTS, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Prison Journal, Vol. 78, No. 4, 390-405 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0032885598078004003

Rehabilitation, Recidivism, and Realism: Evaluating Violence Reduction Programs in Prison

ROGER MATTHEWS

Middlesex University

JOHN PITTS

University of London

There has been a growing concern about responding to violent young people within the prison setting. One of the dominant responses has been to "get tough" by introducing more authoritarian and militaristic regimes, but this strategy has become increasingly identified as being counterproductive and expensive. An alternative approach that is gaining ground, particularly in Canada and the United Kingdom, is the development of Cognitive Skills Programs, which are designed to encourage offenders to "think straight" and thereby to "go straight" and become more law abiding. Although these approaches have been subject to extensive evaluation, it is suggested that the forms of evaluation employed are flawed and that there are serious limitations to using recidivist rates as the principle measure of the success of these programs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. Cesaroni and M. Peterson-Badali
Young Offenders in Custody: Risk and Adjustment
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2005; 32(3): 251 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth JusticeHome page
J. Pitts
Korrectional Karaoke: New Labour and the Zombification of Youth Justice
Youth Justice, August 1, 2001; 1(2): 3 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]