This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by PETERSEN, R. D. Articles by PALUMBO, D. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Social Construction of Intermediate Punishments

Arizona State University

DENNIS J. PALUMBO

Arizona State University

Intermediate sanctions have been said to provide judges with a wider range of sentencing options so that they might better match the severity of punishment with the seriousness of the crime, while diverting nonviolent offenders from prison without posing a risk to public safety. However, the social construction of intermediate sanctions assumes that government is a rational actor that wants to achieve just deserts and crime reduction. The authors argue that instead, intermediate sanctions are socially constructed via political symbolism that is meant to convince the public that government is continuing to be tough on crime while reducing prison costs. Through discussion of shock incarceration and intensive probation, the authors contend that a more favorable way of "doing criminology" and influencing public policy is through discourse about principles of social justice.

The Prison Journal, Vol. 77, No. 1, 77-91 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0032855597077001006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. C. May and P. B. Wood What Influences Offenders' Willingness to Serve Alternative Sanctions? The Prison Journal, June 1, 2005; 85(2): 145 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF]