The Prison Journal

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TURNER, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by APPLEGATE, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Prison Journal, Vol. 77, No. 1, 6-26 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0032855597077001002

Public Tolerance for Community-Based Sanctions

MICHAEL G. TURNER

University of Cincinnati

FRANCIS T. CULLEN

University of Cincinnati

JODY L. SUNDT

University of Cincinnati

BRANDON K. APPLEGATE

University of Central Florida

Based on a factorial design survey of 237 Hamilton County (Cincinnati), Ohio, residents, we assessed not only whether respondents preferred, but also "tolerated" or viewed as acceptable, community-based sanctions. Rating vignettes in which the offender engaged in either burglary or robbery, a slight majority of the respondents favored a sentence involving incarceration. Even so, a sizable minority of the sample preferred to sanction offenders in the community, and tolerance for such a sanction was widespread. There was little support, however, for sanctions that did not involve the close supervision of the offender. We suggest that community-based sanctions will be embraced by the public only to the extent that a persuasive case can be made that the sanction punishes, restrains, and changes offenders—in short, that it "works."


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
S. Maruna and A. King
Selling the Public on Probation: Beyond the Bib
Probation Journal, December 1, 2008; 55(4): 337 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
S. Levrant, F. T. Cullen, B. Fulton, and J. F. Wozniak
Reconsidering Restorative Justice: The Corruption of Benevolence Revisited?
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1999; 45(1): 3 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]