|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Predictors of Recidivism among Incarcerated Female Offenders
JAMES BONTA
Solicitor General Canada
BESSIE PANG
Consultant Criminologist
SUZANNE WALLACE-CAPRETTA
Solicitor General Canada
Compared to male offenders, female offenders have received little empirical attention. This is particularly true in the area of offender risk assessment. Numerous objective risk scales have been developed and used for males, but very few for women. Two studies were conducted to investigate the predictors of female recidivism. The first study attempted to validate a risk scale developed on a male offender population and found poor generalizability. The second study explored additional possible predictors including victimization experiences. Once again, little progress was made. The implications for future research on female offender risk prediction and prison programming are discussed.
The Prison Journal, Vol. 75, No. 3,
277-294 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0032855595075003002

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Salisbury, P. Van Voorhis, and G. V. Spiropoulos
The Predictive Validity of a Gender-Responsive Needs Assessment: An Exploratory Study
Crime Delinquency,
October 1, 2009;
55(4):
550 - 585.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Manchak, J. L. Skeem, K. S. Douglas, and M. Siranosian
Does Gender Moderate the Predictive Utility of the Level of Service Inventory--Revised (LSI-R) for Serious Violent Offenders?
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
May 1, 2009;
36(5):
425 - 442.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mageehon
Caught Up in the System: How Women Who Have Been Incarcerated Negotiate Power
The Prison Journal,
December 1, 2008;
88(4):
473 - 492.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. Wright, E. J. Salisbury, and P. Van Voorhis
Predicting the Prison Misconducts of Women Offenders: The Importance of Gender-Responsive Needs
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,
November 1, 2007;
23(4):
310 - 340.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Holtfreter and R. Cupp
Gender and Risk Assessment: The Empirical Status of the LSI-R for Women
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,
November 1, 2007;
23(4):
363 - 382.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Palmer and C. R. Hollin
The Level of Service Inventory Revised With English Women Prisoners: A Needs and Reconviction Analysis
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
August 1, 2007;
34(8):
971 - 984.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Folsom and J. L. Atkinson
The Generalizability of the LSI-R and the Cat To the Prediction of Recidivism in Female Offenders
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
August 1, 2007;
34(8):
1044 - 1056.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Loza, L. H. Neo, A. Shahinfar, and A. Loza-Fanous
Cross-Validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A Tool for Assessing Violent and Nonviolent Recidivism With Female Offenders
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol,
October 1, 2005;
49(5):
547 - 560.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Blanchette
III. Revisiting Effective Classification Strategies for Women Offenders in Canada
Feminism Psychology,
May 1, 2004;
14(2):
231 - 236.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|