This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by PETERSILIA, J. Articles by DESCHENES, E. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Perceptions of Punishment: Inmates and Staff Rank the Severity of Prison Versus Intermediate Sanctions

RAND

ELIZABETH PIPER DESCHENES

RAND

Proponents of the newer intermediate sanctions argue that there are "equivalencies" of punishment between community-based and prison sentences and that, at some level of intensity, community-based programs have roughly the same punitive "bite." There is little research, however, on the relative severity of intensive supervision in comparison to other sanctions. This study was designed to examine how offenders and staff in Minnesota rank the severity of various criminal sanctions and which particular sanctions they judge equivalent in punitiveness. In addition, we explored how both groups rank the difficulty of commonly imposed probation conditions and which offender background characteristics are associated with perceptions of sanction severity. Our results suggest that there are intermediate sanctions that equate, in terms of punitiveness, with prison. For example, inmates viewed 1 year in prison as "equivalent" in severity to 3 years of intensive probation supervision or 1 year in jail, and they viewed 6 months in jail as equivalent to 1 year of intensive supervision. Although inmates and staff ranked most sanctions similarly, the staff ratings were higher for 3 and 6 months in jail and lower for 1 and 5 years probation. The two groups also differed on the difficulty of complying with individual probation conditions: Staff judged most probation conditions as harder for offenders to comply with than did inmates. Our results provide empirical evidence to support what many have suggested: It is no longer necessary to equate criminal punishment solely with prison. At some level of intensity and length, intensive probation is equally severe as prison and may actually be the more dreaded penalty. The results should give policymakers and justice officials pause, particularly those who suggest they are imprisoning such a large number of offenders—not to use prisons' ability to incapacitate and rehabilitate—but rather to get "tough on crime."

The Prison Journal, Vol. 74, No. 3, 306-328 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0032855594074003003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. C. May, P. B. Wood, J. L. Mooney, and K. I. Minor Predicting Offender-Generated Exchange Rates: Implications for a Theory of Sentence Severity Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2005; 51(3): 373 - 399. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. May and P. B. Wood What Influences Offenders' Willingness to Serve Alternative Sanctions? The Prison Journal, June 1, 2005; 85(2): 145 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. S. TAXMAN, D. SOULE, and A. GELB Graduated Sanctions: Stepping into Accountable Systems and Offenders The Prison Journal, June 1, 1999; 79(2): 182 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Lane Can You Make a Horse Drink? The Effects of a Corrections Course on Attitudes Toward Criminal Punishment Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1997; 43(2): 186 - 202. [Abstract]

				J. PETERSILIA A Crime Control Rationale for Reinvesting in Community Corrections The Prison Journal, December 1, 1995; 75(4): 479 - 496. [Abstract] [PDF]