This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by WELSH, W. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Ideologies and Incarceration: Legislator Attitudes Toward Jail Overcrowding

Temple University

Despite increasing legislative influence on criminal justice policy, research on the determinants and effects of lawmakers' attitudes toward specific criminal justice problems has been sparse. Combining interview and survey methods, this study examined punishment ideologies of California legislators and investigated linkages with attitudes about incarceration and jail overcrowding (perceived causes, effects, and solutions). Results suggested that legislators held beliefs supporting a mix of punishment ideologies, and ideology was only weakly related to support for specific punishment policies. Mixed ideologies and the lack of a clear distinction between liberal and conservative responses imply greater potential for bipartisan solutions to jail overcrowding and other criminal justice problems than has commonly been assumed. Support for initiatives such as juvenile prevention and intermediate sanctions was widespread and cut across party lines.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. G. TURNER, F. T. CULLEN, J. L. SUNDT, and B. K. APPLEGATE Public Tolerance for Community-Based Sanctions The Prison Journal, March 1, 1997; 77(1): 6 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]